![]() I'm wondering if the old Firefox version is now just totally confused by it all. long, long before signed AMO xpis are required on Firefox versions (43 or 44?) se/165669/ That version shouldn't have been signed in the first place, as the max-version is for FF17, i.e. I click on the "see complete version history", locate the version that says "compatible with Firefox 3.6" and then attempt to install from. I already have these extensions installed for Firefox 2.0.20 on the Windows 98SE side of this dual-boot system, I see no reason why it is unreasonable to ask to be able to install them on the XP side. Is there any way to turn off this broken sign verification thing or something I need to do to download the older versions of the extensions that work with Firefox 3.6? I know all of these had versions for Firefox 3 and most had versions for Firefox 2.0.20. There are several others I'd like as well. I REALLY want Adblock Plus, Greasemonkey, and Stylish.ĭownthemall, righttoclick, flashkiller, element hiding helper for adblock plus, and goParentFolder are high priority as well. I MUST have NoSquint, ImageZoom, and QuickJava. However, I can't get any extensions to install, all of them keep giving me a driver signing error when I try to download them from .Īntivirus is down, downloading the. I just tried to download Firefox 3.6, and found 3.6.28 available with a 2015 date. It makes Netscape 6 on a 300mhz PowerMac seem fast. It is a 1ghz single-core system with RAM maxed out at 512mb.įirefox30+ is WAY too slow on this system. One is a print server for a parallel printer. It is NOT my primary system anymore and hasn't been in over ten years, but used for two primary purposes these days. I'm occasionally using a REALLY old computer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |